|
|
|
| “Dual Carbon” Game and Countermeasures under Carbon Politics |
| Liu Guizhou1, Dou Lirong1,2, Xu Xin1 |
1. CNODC 2. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Carbon politics is quietly emerging, and countries around the world are divided into three categories. Western developed countries consuming clean energy are classified as the first category. Energy-importing developing countries are included in the second category, and resource-rich countries relying on fossil fuel export are sorted as the third category. Countries of the “three categories” have already and will continue to play games over “dual carbon” round after round. The goal of Western countries’ carbon politics is to continue to lead the world, stay ahead, and use their advantage of low emission to extract carbon benefits. Energy-importing developing countries face threats and opportunities. Resource-rich countries are unable to tackle the situation without aggravating another problem. China should narrow its gap in the new energy industry with Western developed countries, continue to promote natural gas pipeline construction to ensure energy security, control the pace to realize the “dual carbon” goal, and strive for its own legitimate rights and interests.
|
|
Published: 04 November 2024
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
Zhao Le and Niu Lixian, “Interpretation of the Full Text of Russia’s Socio-Economic Development Strategy for Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions by 2050” [WeChat], Mining and Financial Observation, November 8, 2021.
|
| [2] |
International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP): Emissions Trading Worldwide: ICAP Status Report 2021.
|
| [3] |
World Bank: Emissions Trading in Practice: A Handbook on Design and Implementation.
|
| [4] |
Qian Guoqiang, General Introduction and Latest Developments of National Carbon Emissions Trading Market.
|
| No related articles found! |
|
|
|
|